Legal Opinion

McRoberts v. Burns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1952No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

It is difficult to understand tbe necessity for tbe interminable litigation in this case or the confusion which has permeated it.

This case originally involved two separate and distinct issues — (1) a counsel fee, and (2) an accounting of a few items — (a), sums of money received by defendant Burns for plaintiff and (b) sums of money advanced or disbursed to or for plaintiff by defendants, Burns, Packard and Mrs. Burns.

It would be well to keep in mind from the very beginning what the parties frequently forgot through their written briefs and oral arguments, viz.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MOWRY v. McWherterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Melnick v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. McCahan v. ReameySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  4. Owens v. WehrleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. McRoberts v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein and Darby Farms, Inc., Maurice LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Best v. Realty Management Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Egan v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lichtenstein v. LichtensteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Washington Mall v. Board for the Assessment & Revision of TaxesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API