Legal Opinion

Egan v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1989No. 3500 and 3501PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This appeal involves two civil actions which were consolidated prior to trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The appeal is from an order entered October 31, 1988, and docketed November 16, 1988, denying the motion of appellant, Warren-Ehret-Linck Company (WELCO), for post-trial relief. This order was reduced to judgment in favor of appellees Atlantic Richfield Company and Turner Construction Company (Turner) on November 22, 1988. 1 On November 30, 1988, appellant filed this timely appeal. We affirm.

The facts of the case as set forth by the lower court are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Murphy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Bishop v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. MOWRY v. McWherterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Courts v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leonard v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Woodburn v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Hackman v. Moyer PackingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Leonard v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Leonard v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API