Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 8, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 42987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOOD, District Judge.
Before us are several motions relating to the implementation of a settlement agreement between the parties. Some consideration of the relevant background of the case is necessary to make clear the issues presented by these motions.
*153In 1967, this action was instituted by Frances Sharp Lichtenstein naming Darby Farms, Inc., and her then husband Maurice Lichtenstein as defendants. The complaint alleged misuse of the corporate funds by Mr. Lichtenstein in his capacity as the principal officer and director of Darby. Mrs. Lichtenstein requested an accounting and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Unit Vending Corp. v. LacasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein and Darby Farms, Inc., Maurice LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- McRoberts v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein, and Darby Farms, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Lichtenstein v. LichtensteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein, and Darby Farms, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Rosenbaum v. Raiton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1980