Legal Opinion
Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein and Darby Farms, Inc., Maurice Lichtenstein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 2, 1970No. 17915_1PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
In 1967 a diversity civil action was instituted by Frances Sharp Lichtenstein naming Darby Farms, Inc., and her then husband Maurice Lichtenstein as defendants. The complaint alleged misuse of the corporate funds by Mr. Lichtenstein in his capacity as principal officer and director. Mrs. Lichtenstein requested an accounting and repayment of funds wrongfully distributed by the corporation to Mr. Lichtenstein.
Pursuant to a written agreement between the parties, this action was settled. This agreement also purported to settle a similar suit brought by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Unit Vending Corp. v. LacasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- In re RubinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices, Local 420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Martha R. KaveCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc. v. National Friction Products Corp. And Earl E. FigertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.