Legal Opinion

Helstrom v. North Slope Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1990No. S-2900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

At issue is whether a settlement agreement between Steven Helstrom and the North Slope Borough is voidable by Hel-strom for duress and unconscionability. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the Borough. We reverse.

1. PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

According to Helstrom, he started working for the North Slope Borough as a mechanic about August 20, 1984. His hourly wage was $20.89, “and [he] was scheduled for a forty hour week.” Four days after he started, Helstrom was promoted to chief mechanic and his hourly wage increased to $23.18, and his “hours were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zeilinger v. SOHIO Alaska Petroleum Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Krossa v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bishop v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API