Legal Opinion

La Plante v. Implement Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1944No. File No. 6914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, Ch. J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover on a, contract of employment under which it is contended that the plaintiff was to. receive a stipulated salary and a commission on certain gross insurance premiums. The salary has been paid. The defendants deny that the contract of employment provided for commissions.

A pre-trial conference was held under the provisions of chapter 216, ND Sess. Laws 1943 at which both parties were represented by counsel. The pre-trial court at the completion of the conference entered an order requiring the defendant to either admit that the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Sioux Falls v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Meeks v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Ostlund v. EcklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Konstantine v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rude v. LetnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Blue Arm v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ferguson v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Jennings v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Becker Ex Rel. Becker v. DoubekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API