Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Shipp

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1966No. 8224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. BURDICK, District Judge.

This action to quiet title was remanded by this court to the trial court for a new trial on the single question of the apportionment of accreted property claimed by the respective parties. Jennings v. Shipp (N.D.), 115 N.W.2d 12. We directed the trial court “to apportion the new shore line between the parties in parts corresponding to the ownership of the old shore line, and determine the boundary line between the two tracts by drawing a straight line between a point on one shore line where the segments owned by the respective parties join to a similar point…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jennings v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. La Plante v. Implement Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. ReeveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Newman Signs, Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jundt v. Jurassic Resources Development, North America, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API