Legal Opinion
Mangino v. Incorporated Village of Patchogue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2011No. 06-CV-5716 (JFB) (AKT)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
Defendants Incorporated Village of Patehogue (“the Village” or “Patchogue”), Fire Marshall John P. Poulos (“Poulos”), and Code Enforcement Officer James Nudo (“Nudo”) (collectively “defendants” or “the Village defendants”) bring the instant motion for reconsideration, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3, of the Court’s September 23, 2010 Memorandum and Order, granting in part and denying in part the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1
Specifically, defendants argue that they are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs’ malicious abuse…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mangino v. Incorporated Village of PatchogueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Ratajack v. Brewster Fire Department, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Tsesarskaya v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Jackson ex rel. Jackson v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Levantino v. New York State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.