Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURr OE THE STATE OE NEBRASKA. • This was an action brought by Hector C. Bollong agáinst the Schuyler National Bank, a corporation located and doing business in Colfax County, Nebraska, in the District Court of that county, to recover the penalties imposed by the statutes of the United States for knowingly contracting for and receiving usurious interest.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURr OE THE STATE OE NEBRASKA. • This was an action brought by Hector C. Bollong agáinst the Schuyler National Bank, a corporation located and doing business in Colfax County, Nebraska, in the District Court of that county, to recover the penalties imposed by the statutes of the United States for knowingly contracting for and receiving usurious interest. The original petition or complaint was filed March 19,1887, and the judgment recovered thereon was reversed by the state Supreme Court and the cause remanded, (Schuyler Bank, v. Bollong, 24 Nebraska, 821,) whereupon on…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
In view of the provisions of section 5198 of the Eevised Statutes, as corrected by the act of February 18, 1875, 18 Stat. 316, 320, c. 80; the proviso of the fourth section of the act of July 12, 1882, 22 Stat. 162, 163, c. 290, and the decision of this court in First National Bank of Charlotte v. Morgan, 132 U. S. 141, counsel properly limited his assignment of errors to the matters specified, and does not now seek to rest the jurisdiction of the court upon any other ground than may be involved therein. And it is not contended that the writ of error can be maintained except upon the theory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chappell v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Brooks v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by14 opinions
- California Powder Works v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WoodfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Morrison v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Neininger v. CowanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.