Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Woodford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1914No. 531PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court under § 237, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion. By operation of law, the Carmack Amendment was written into the live-stock contract under which the shipment in this case was made, and that amendment repealed § 196, Ky. Const., as to such shipment. Adams Exp. Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491; Adams Exp. Co. v. Walker, 119 Kentucky, 121; C., B. & Q. Ry.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court under § 237, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion. By operation of law, the Carmack Amendment was written into the live-stock contract under which the shipment in this case was made, and that amendment repealed § 196, Ky. Const., as to such shipment. Adams Exp. Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491; Adams Exp. Co. v. Walker, 119 Kentucky, 121; C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 226 U. S. 613; C., M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Solan, 169 U. S. 133; C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Dodd, 153 Kentucky,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Catesby Woodford and John T. Ireland, defendants in error, plaintiffs below, brought suit in the Fayette Circuit Court, of Kentucky, against The Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover damages for the loss of a number of race horses and injury to others shipped by them on November 17, 1910, over the lines of the defendant from Lexington, Kentucky, to Juarez, Mexico. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs in the trial court, judgment upon which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky (152 Kentucky, 398), and the case is here upon writ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Erie Railroad v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Layton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Schuyler National Bank v. BollongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Cousins v. WigodaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Barbour v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Illinois Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API