Legal Opinion

Neininger v. Cowan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1900No. 347PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up by writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of West Virginia. The action w,as brought by the plaintiff, Frederick W. *788Neininger, against John K. Cowan and Oscar G. Murray, receivers of the Baltimore & Ohio Bailroad Company. The cause of action is injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision with the railroad train of the defendants at a railroad crossing at the intersection of Main and Sixteenth streets, in the city of Wheeling, W. Ya. The cause was heard in the circuit court with a jury. Only the testimony on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. La Bonte v. Mutual Fire & Lightning InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dishon v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API