Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 29, 1888No. 1037PublishedCited by 23 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. Motion to dismiss oe affirm. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

Bradshaw recovered judgment December 6th, 1887, against Chappell in the Ciróuit Court for Howard County, Maryland, in an action of trespass on the case, after a trial by jury upon a plea of not guilty, for damages by fire to his (Bradshaw’s) schooner, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of Chappell’s servants in cutting a burning scow or lighter loose from Chappell’s wharf and allowing it to drift against Bradshaw’s vessel. From this judgment Chappell prosecuted an appeal to the Court of Appeals of Maryland, by which ‘ tribunal the judgment was affirmed on the 14th day of March,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Leeper v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Panama Railroad v. VasquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Electric Street Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API