Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Nothing renders this case difficult, unless it be a misunderstanding of the real facts.

That George W. Burroughs, a child six years of age, sustained an injury, resulting in a fracture of the bones of his right hand, is not disputed. It is also an established fact that the injury was produced by reason of a telephone pole rolling upon the child’s hand.

The plaintiff charged — ■

“That said defendant carelessly and negligently placed said pole on a hill or declivity, where children were playing and were apt to come in contact with the same * *, and carelessly and negligently failed to block or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Macdonald v. O'ReillyOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hill v. Tualatin AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kelly v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McGarvey v. Independent Oil & Grease Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sarna v. American Bosch Magneto Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Carr v. Oregon-Washington R.R. Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fisher v. BurrellOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Falardeau v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API