Burroughs v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Nothing renders this case difficult, unless it be a misunderstanding of the real facts.
That George W. Burroughs, a child six years of age, sustained an injury, resulting in a fracture of the bones of his right hand, is not disputed. It is also an established fact that the injury was produced by reason of a telephone pole rolling upon the child’s hand.
The plaintiff charged — ■
“That said defendant carelessly and negligently placed said pole on a hill or declivity, where children were playing and were apt to come in contact with the same * *, and carelessly and negligently failed to block or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Macdonald v. O'ReillyOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Hill v. Tualatin AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Kelly v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- McGarvey v. Independent Oil & Grease Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sarna v. American Bosch Magneto Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Carr v. Oregon-Washington R.R. Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Fisher v. BurrellOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Falardeau v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.