Legal Opinion

Indiahoma Refining Co. v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1923No. 2154PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlett, J.

In a suit filed by defendant in error, G. Clint Wood, against the India-homa Refining Company, and the St. Bouis ■& Port Worth Producing Company, plaintiffs in error, and the receivers of the Home •Oil Refining Company, it was alleged and proven that on June 17, 1E>19, plaintiff entered into a written contract whereby he agreed to sell to the Home Oil & Refining Company an undivided one-half interest in and .to a 117-acre oil and gas lease in Wichita county, Tex., for a consideration of $500,000, payable ■as follows: $10,000 cash, $40,000, July 7,1919, $50,000 August 7, 1919, $50,000…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Bissell v. FossSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Randall, Sawyer & Dyer v. Merideth & AilmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API