Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1921No. Civ. No. 4047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts axe stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

STURTEVANT J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for alleged deceit. The defendants appeared and demurred, the demurrer was sustained, and, the plaintiffs declining and neglecting to amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In their complaint the plaintiffs allege that O. N. Miller, the husband, signed an agreement to exchange lands and they set forth the agreement; that Margaret Miller, the wife, later signed a paper agreeing to the terms of the paper signed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herwick v. LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hackleman v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alberda v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API