Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1997No. CC 10-93-01272; CA A81472; SC S43291PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant was charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence of the methamphetamine, which a police officer had found on his person. The trial court denied that motion. Thereafter, after a trial on stipulated facts, the court found defendant guilty. The Court of Appeals reversed. State v. Stanley, 139 Or App 526, 912 P2d 948 (1996). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The pertinent facts are undisputed. On January 2, 1993, Springfield…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. JacobusOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DinsmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. RudderOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. CockeOregon Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API