Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Horace E. Conklin, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Broome Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 13th day of December, 1921, determining and enforcing an alleged lien for services, counsel fees and expenses.

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

This action was brought by a wife to obtain an absolute divorce on the ground of the adultery of her husband. After issue had been joined counsel for the plaintiff applied for an allowance of counsel fees and alimony. The court directed the payment of $200 per week for alimony, $7,500 “ on account of counsel fee,” and $1,500 on account of disbursements of counsel already or prospectively to be made. It then referred the issues of the action to a referee to hear and determine the same. It further referred to him the question whether the plaintiff was entitled to have any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Conklin v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Polizotti v. PolizottiNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Rosen v. RosenNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Parkas v. ParkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Holt v. CarrNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In re GriffingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API