Conklin v. Conklin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Horace E. Conklin, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Otsego Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 12th day of January, 1921, as directs the payment by defendant of $200 per week for the support of the plaintiff and her three children during the pendency of the action, of $7,500 on account of counsel fees, and of $1,500 for the subpoena of witnesses.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J. :
The complaint in this action is for an absolute divorce within the State of New York under its laws. The defendant has denied the material allegation of the complaint, in an unverified answer, and has given formal notice that he will not cross-examine any of the witnesses of the plaintiff upon the subject of the alleged adultery. The learned court at Special Term, in ordering alimony, counsel fees, etc., has handed down an opinion in which he says that he (the defendant) “ has in effect confessed that he has been unfaithful to his marital vows, and is guilty of the several…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Holmes v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Deisler v. DeislerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Lawrence v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Shea v. O'SheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Conklin v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- O'Shea v. O'SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Brody v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957