Legal Opinion

Holt v. Carr

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The defendant herein, Irene A. Carr, brought an action, against the defendant Frank J. Carr for a separation. A notice of motion for counsel fee and alimony pendente lite was served on said Frank J. Carr. On the return day of such motion the same was referred by this court to an official referee thereof to hear and report. The referee fixed a date for a hearing. Shortly before said day defendants herein settled their domestic difficulties. Such settlement was made without the knowledge of plaintiff herein, then counsel for the defendant Irene A. Carr. Plaintiff was later informed by defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waxstein v. BrenhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Holt v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Seitz v. SeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API