Legal Opinion

Eberhart v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, No. 576PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below granting the defendant-appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. When ruling on a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, the complaint, the answer containing new matter, and the reply to new matter shall be considered.1 Herman v. Stern, 419 Pa. 272, 276 n. 1, 213 A.2d 594, 596 n. 1 (1965). Further, as this Court stated in Kroiz v. Blumenfeld, 229 Pa. Superior Ct. 194, 197, 323 A.2d 339, 340 (1974):

“The standards for determining whether a judgment on the pleadings should be allowed are clear. .. . All of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Framlau Corp. v. Delaware CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vasilis v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Kotovsky v. Ski Liberty Operating Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lyons v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Scantlin v. UlrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. H. Rupert & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API