Legal Opinion

Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 2011No. 20091957; A145136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioner is an Idaho company that was authorized by the Department of Human Services (DHS) to prepare and package meals for distribution to eligible elderly persons and disabled Medicaid participants. In a contested case hearing, DHS found that petitioner had violated an agreement to abide by certain nutritional and delivery standards, and, as a result, the agency revoked petitioner’s status as an approved provider. On judicial review, petitioner argues that the standards at issue were invalid because they had not been promulgated according to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Vulcan Arbor Hill Corp. v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Coats v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Minor v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. McCleery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API