Legal Opinion

Coats v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2002No. TC 97CV0285MS; CA A105379; SC S48298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

This case presents the question whether, in a breach of contract action, a circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to review the validity of agency rules that the parties have incorporated as contract terms. The Court of Appeals assumed without discussion that the circuit court has such jurisdiction. Coats v. ODOT, 170 Or App 32, 11 P3d 258 (2000). We conclude that, although the circuit court in this case had jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs claims that defendant breached the parties’ contract, it lacked jurisdiction over plaintiffs rule challenges. We therefore vacate the Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Alto v. State Fire MarshalOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Vulcan Arbor Hill Corp. v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. City of Lake Oswego v. MylanderOregon Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Oregon Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Coats v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Coats-Sellers v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API