Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2012No. A146029PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

In this proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400,1 petitioner asserts, in his first assignment of error, that a notice-of-rights form used by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) constitutes a “rule” for purposes of the Administrative Procedures Act (the APA), ORS chapter 183, and is therefore invalid because it was adopted without compliance with the applicable rulemaking procedures. ORS 183.400(4)(c). Petitioner further, and alternatively, asserts that the notice-of-rights form violates the federal and Oregon constitutions and contravenes statutory authority. ORS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burke v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Amazon Cooperating Tenants v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Rutherford v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Kessler v. Oregon Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Pen-Nor, Inc. v. Oregon Department of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Two Rivers Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API