Legal Opinion
McCleery v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 21, 1994No. CA A84057PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Petitioners seek a determination under ORS 183.400 that a “policy statement” issued by the Oregon Board of Chiropractic Examiners (OBCE) is an administrative rule and that it was not adopted in compliance with statutory rulemaking procedures. We hold that it is an invalid rule.
In January, 1991, OBCE issued a statement, which provided, in part:
“In January, 1982, the United States District Court in Wisconsin issued a permanent nationwide injunction against the manufacturing, promoting, selling, leasing, distribution, shipping, delivering, or using in any way any Toftness Radiation Detector[1]…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Amazon Cooperating Tenants v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Fitzgerald v. Oregon Board of OptometryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Portland Inn, Inc. v. Oregon Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011