Legal Opinion

McCleery v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1994No. CA A84057PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Petitioners seek a determination under ORS 183.400 that a “policy statement” issued by the Oregon Board of Chiropractic Examiners (OBCE) is an administrative rule and that it was not adopted in compliance with statutory rulemaking procedures. We hold that it is an invalid rule.

In January, 1991, OBCE issued a statement, which provided, in part:

“In January, 1982, the United States District Court in Wisconsin issued a permanent nationwide injunction against the manufacturing, promoting, selling, leasing, distribution, shipping, delivering, or using in any way any Toftness Radiation Detector[1]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Amazon Cooperating Tenants v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Fitzgerald v. Oregon Board of OptometryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Portland Inn, Inc. v. Oregon Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API