Lord v. Customized Consulting Specialty, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether a third party defendant may recover costs under N.C.R. Civ. R, Rule 41(d) (2003) from original plaintiff upon plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of the action under N.C.R. Civ. R, Rule 41(a). We hold that such recovery is permitted.
84 Components Company, 84 Lumber Company, and 84 Lumber Company, a limited liability partnership (third party defendants) appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion for costs. Customized Consulting Specialty, Inc. (defendant) sold a new house to William and Jennifer Lord (plaintiffs) on 15 January 1999.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Alsup v. PitmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Springs v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- McDonnell v. Guilford County Tradewind Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Morgan v. SteinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Miller v. Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Oakes v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.