Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Railway Co. v. Fonville

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Olclahoona County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This was an action for personal injuries, brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the Metropolitan Railway Co., to recover damages sustained by her by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant company. The defenses interposed by the defendant were: First, a general denial; and, second, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

The testimony of the plaintiff disclosed substantially the following facts: That she resided about fourteen…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Western Paving v. Bd. of Com'rs of LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Davis v. Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Johnson v. State Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API