Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The State Bank of Gate, Okla., as plaintiff, brought its action against P. A. Johnson on certain promissory note in the sum of $4,000. Mary M. Johnson was made a party defendant, as it was alleged P. A. Johnson, her husband, had transferred all his property to his wife for the purpose, as alleged, of hindering, delaying, and defrauding his creditors. Mary M. Johnson does not, however, appear to be interested in this appeal, and P. A. Johnson will be referred to herein as defendant. Defendant was president of the plaintiff bank, and the banlc was capitalized at $20,000, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bank of Commerce of Ralston v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Hargrove v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. U. C. Guss v. Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Remarkis v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Clayton v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Potts v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Farris v. McCourrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. PeaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API