Legal Opinion
Chatterjee v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 2006No. SC 17354PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The plaintiffs, Pumendu Chatterjee and Amita Chatterjee, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of revenue services, 1 denying their request for a tax refund pursuant to Gen eral Statutes § 12-39s. 2 On appeal, 3 the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review the defendant’s decision to deny the plaintiffs’ request for a refund because, under § 12-39s (c), that determination is committed to the defendant’s sole discretion after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Perricone v. PerriconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.