Legal Opinion

Bunn v. Furstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1943No. Appeals, 200 and 201PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

Nelson Jacot, the most important witness to this automobile accident, was not called by either side at the trial. He was shown to have been a passenger in the automobile which injured the minor plaintiff. The record does not disclose whether his absence was explained. As a result, the evidence of negligence was, to say the least, meager and the evidence of agency largely circumstantial.

Nevertheless, the verdicts were for plaintiffs. Defendant then filed motions for judgment n.o.v. and for new trial. The court overruled the former and granted a new trial. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Phillips v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Trimble v. Mennel Milling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Petkov v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Kline v. Moyer (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Tupponce v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Jangula v. United States Rubber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API