Kline v. Moyer (Et Al.)

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

The factual situation and the principles of law applicable to the merits of this case are fully set forth in the opinion on the first appeal, reported in 325 Pa. 357, when this Court ordered a new trial. Clarifying evidence was to be presented as to whether appellant’s negligence was concurrent or wholly independent; that is, whether or not the co-defendant Moyer could have avoided the injury had he exercised reasonable care áfter sighting appellant’s truck, thereby breaking the causal connection between appellant’s negligence and appellee’s injuries.…