Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Brown

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1997PublishedCited by 457 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

In this action for damages, the plaintiff, Regina Darlene Hunter, alleged that as a child she was sexually abused by the defendant, Ed Brown, Jr., but was unable to file this action prior to 1993 because she repressed the memory of the abuse. The trial court found no reason to toll the statute of limitations and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

The issue before us is whether the discovery rule applies to affect the accrual of Hunter’s claim. We conclude, after a thorough examination of the record and a careful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gonzales v. Alman Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by457 opinions

  1. Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cheryl Brown Giggers v. Memphis Housing AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Pendleton v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

452 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API