Legal Opinion

Hay v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1984No. Docket 71469PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Warshawsky, J.

Defendants appeal as of right from a February 8, 1983, judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs following a nonjury trial. The primary question in this appeal is whether certain fringe benefits should be included in the base for computing pension amounts payable to plaintiff-retirees.

Plaintiffs are former employees of the Highland Park police and fire departments who retired after 1968. They are members of a retirement system established in Chapter 19 of the Highland Park City Charter and are entitled to receive pension benefits thereunder. Defendant board of trustees is charged with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Sebewaing Industries, Inc. v. Village of SebewaingMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Commonwealth Life & Accident Insurance v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hilligoss v. LaDowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Jahn v. City of WoodstockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Craig v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gentile v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Ombrello v. Montgomery Ward Long Term Disability TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. PUB. EMPLOYEES' RET. SYS. OF NEV. v. LAS VEGAS MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS ASS'NNevada Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Kohtz v. City of YorkNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API