Legal Opinion

Banish v. City of Hamtramck

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1968No. Docket 2,658PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiffs are retired policemen and firemen and retired members of tbe police signal and fire alarm systems of tbe city of Hamtramck. Under tbe provisions of tbe city charter, they are entitled to receive a pension at the rate of one-half the pay of the rank in which they served at the time of retirement. The charter provides that in the event of any change at any time after retirement “in • such rate of pay” the pension thereafter will be “at the rate of 1/2 the pay for said rank so changed.”

The charter provision was adopted in 1938, and from the time of its adoption through the fiscal year…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Currie v. FitingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Board of Trustees v. Village of Glen EllynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kovacs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  3. People v. LawMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Hilligoss v. LaDowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API