Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gentile v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1984No. Docket 71630, 71631PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Martin, J.

Retired policemen and retired firemen of the City of Detroit brought separate actions to require their retirement systems to include fringe benefits paid by the city to its present employees in the determination of the pensions the retirees now recieve. After a careful perusal of the evidence the circuit court ordered the following fringe benefits to be included in the computation of pensions:

"(a) Longevity pay
"(b) Holiday pay and vacation pay
"(c) Leave time
"(d) Overtime
"(e) Shift differential
"(f) Cost of living adjustment
"(g) Food
"(h) Hospitalization and medical and dental insurance, but not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Stover v. RETIREMENT BD. OF CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES FIREMENMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Murphy v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Egan v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Guagenti v. James N. Gray Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Kohtz v. City of YorkNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API