Legal Opinion
Alkire v. INTERSTATE THEATRES CORPORATION
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 2, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-3936-TPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAURO, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a California citizen who as an individual and as a trustee controls a substantial interest in a number of movie theatre companies which are defendants in this case.
The corporate defendants have a complex relationship of ownership and control. 1 For the purposes of this memorandum, it is sufficient to note that all the corporations are principally in the business of owning, operating and managing movie theatres. The individual defendants are owners of stock in the corporate defendants or are trustees of a trust which owns stock in the defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Union Bank of Tennessee v. Jolly's Adm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Weiss v. RouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re English Seafood (USA) Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Codos v. National Diagnostic Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Feiwus v. Genpar, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. John Adams Trust Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- TBK Partners, Ltd. v. Western Union Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.