Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Hedden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $308.78 and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for that amount. The cause was heard before Jelley, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Prom an order denying the motion of defendant Warner Hardware Company for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
In 1913 defendant Hedden as contractor, as the court found, erected two houses on Lyndale avenue, in Minneapolis, numbered respectively 4540 and 4544. He made a contract with plaintiff to furnish the mill work and the same was furnished accordingly. The first item was furnished February 7,1913. A balance in substantially the amount claimed in the complaint in this action is unquestionably due for the mill work furnished for No. 4540, and a mechanic’s lien is claimed on that property therefor. The only question is as to the last item of $1.25, and from *32this also arises the only substantial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Burns v. SewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Berger v. TurnbladSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. MorawetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- John Paul Lumber Co. v. HormelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grainger & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Carr-Cullen Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. SchnobrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Lampert Lumber Co. v. ThanningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.