Legal Opinion

Lampert Lumber Co. v. Thanning

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 29, 1924No. 23,886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Tbis controversy arises out of an effort on tbe part of tbe plaintiff to- foreclose a mecbanic’s lien. One Tbanning, being tbe fee owner of a farm, sold tbe same on contract for deed to one Wienandt, wbo built a bouse tbereon. An estimate of tbe material required was furnished to plaintiff and it contracted with Wienandt to furnish tbe material at an agreed price, tbe material to be delivered as required. Tbe plaintiff made delivery of tbis material over a period of several weeks and tbe last undisputed item thereof was delivered December 3, 1920. Plaintiff claims a balance unpaid in tbe sum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Burns v. SewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. MorawetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. SchnobrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API