Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Waterville Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— Hart was engaged in live-stock business, farm ing, and running a meat market. He bad one bank account for all bis business. He was accustomed to issuing checks for cattle purchased, and at time of shipment, making draft on the consignee, payable to the cashier of the bank which is now insolvent. This draft would be credited to Hart’s general checking account in the bank, and the checks issued for the cattle as they came in would be paid from it. About November 27 and 28, 1925, Hart bought cattle of intervener and his assignors, and gave them his cheeks on the insolvent bank for the purchase…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  5. Dolph v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diehl v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Messick v. RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
  3. Orlich v. Rubio Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Sherberg v. First Nat. Bank of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Sherberg v. First Nat. Bank of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API