Legal Opinion

Orlich v. Rubio Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 5, 1949No. 47472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOliver, J.

— Maurice Weisz operated a produce business at Brighton, Iowa, under the name of Weisz. Produce. He bought produce from dealers, processed it, and sold it in quantities to buyers in Chicago and- elsewhere. He banked with defendant, Rubio Savings Bank of Brighton. Plaintiff, Mitch ell Orlich, bought and sold poultry and eggs at Colfax, Iowa, under the name of Orlich Produce.

Counts 1 and 2 of plaintiff’s petition allege that about June 3, 1946, defendant and Weisz orally agreed Weisz Produce would continue the produce business, would pay with checks drawn on defendant and would deposit all…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  3. First National Bank of Portland v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Schaller v. Marine National Bank of NeenahCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. Clinton Natl. Bank v. SaucierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Sarachek v. Luana Savings Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API