Legal Opinion
Messick v. Rardin
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided March 6, 1934No. 625PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff sues to have certain government bonds held by defendant delivered to- her as her property. Defendant, conservator of the National Trust Bank of Charleston, asserts that the bonds do not belong to plaintiff, but that they are the property of the hank.
On March 1, 1933, H. H. Messiek, husband of plaintiff, had on general deposit with the hank $7,184-.67. This balance remained substantially the same from day to day until March 4, 1933, when it was $7,205.97. Upon .this account plaintiff had authority to draw. During all the same period plaintiff had a checking account of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Goodwin v. KeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Griswold v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Davis v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of Chicago-Garfield Ridge v. Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Northern Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- County of Cook v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1983
- Boone v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936