Legal Opinion

In re Parlanti

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 7, 1947No. 5230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in his rejection of claims 21, 28, ancl 24, being all the claims in appellants’ application for a patent for alleged “new and useful improvements in Casting of Nonferrous Metals.”

The rejection was based upon the ground that the appealed claims lacked invention over the disclosure of the patent to Newton et al. in view of the patent to Todt, cited as follows:

Todt, 1,973,550, September 11, 1934.

Newton et al., 2,023,645, December 10, 1935.

Appellants request…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. In re IrmscherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re EisenhutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of BowdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Matter of the Application of Otto EisenhutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API