Legal Opinion

Adcock v. Rollins Protective Services Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1981No. C-800198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P.J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, John Adcock and Mary Jane Adcock, seek reversal of the judgment against them in their action to recover temporary damages negligently caused by defendants-appellees, Rollins Protective Services Company and Paul Dedman, to plaintiffs’ dwelling. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendants because, while the evidence included the cost of repairing the damage, the plaintiffs failed to present evidence of the diminution in the market value of their home proximately caused by the defendants. Plaintiffs assert that this was error and we agree.

Defendants conceded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Brady v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Klein v. GarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Paul v. First National Bank of Cincinnati, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Denoyer v. LambOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Martin v. Design Construction Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Reeser v. Weaver Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Northpointe Properties v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API