Legal Opinion
Whitehorse v. Critchfield
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 3, 1986No. 4—85—0870, 4—86—0066 consPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE McCULLOUGH
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his complaint. We affirm.
On March 30, 1984, plaintiff filed a four-count complaint, naming Larry Critchfield, Edith Critchfield (Critchfields), Thomas Murphy, and Linda Murphy (Murphys) as defendants. Plaintiff concedes that all counts of the complaint are based upon tortious interference with a parent’s custodial rights. The factual allegations of the complaint are taken as true for purposes of the motion to dismiss. (Dymek v. Nyquist (1984), 128 Ill. App. 3d 859, 469 N.E.2d 659.) A cause of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kenneth G. Lloyd v. Irma Loeffler and Alvin F. LoefflerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Thomas A. Bennett v. Patricia A. BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Doe v. McKayIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Dralle v. RuderIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Larson v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Marshak v. MarshakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.