Legal Opinion

United States v. 14 CASES, ETC.,(BAG)" NAREMCO MEDI-MATIC

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 29, 1974No. Civ. A. 2806PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

COLLINSON, District Judge.

This is a seizure and condemnation action brought under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-892 (1970), to condemn a quantity of drugs known as “Myconox Medicated” (Myconox) and “Medi-Matic Free Choice Poultry Formula” (Medi-Matic). Plaintiff alleges that each article is a drug which is adulterated and misbranded while being held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce; and that, therefore, each drug is subject to seizure and condemnation within the ambit of section 334(a)(1) of the Act. 1…

2Cases cited22 opinions

Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

United States v. An Article of Food Consisting of 345/50-Pound Bags, Etc., Marshall Minerals, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
The United States of America v. An Article of Drug . . . "Entrol-C Medicated", Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
Southeastern Minerals, Inc. And Marshall Minerals, Inc. v. Patricia Roberts Harris, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
United States v. Naremco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
United States v. Articles of Food & Drug Coli-Trol 80 MedicatedDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.