Legal Opinion

United States v. Naremco, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1977No. 76-1623PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, Chief Judge.

For nine years, Naremco, Inc. and the Government have disagreed over the applicability of certain provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. (Supp. V. 1975), to products containing gentian violet (methylrosaniline chloride). Naremco, 1 a Missouri corporation, has repeatedly manufactured and sold a variety of products containing gentian violet without first obtaining pre-marketing approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Naremco has consistently contended that its products are exempt from statutory provisions requiring…

2Cases cited11 opinions

United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
Ciba Corp. v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

United States v. An Article of Food Consisting of 345/50-Pound Bags, Etc., Marshall Minerals, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
United States v. An Article of Drug, Etc., and Palmer Chemical & Equipment Company, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
Fmali Herb, Inc. v. Margaret M. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
Southeastern Minerals, Inc. And Marshall Minerals, Inc. v. Patricia Roberts Harris, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Coco Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.