United States v. Davis
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RITTER, Senior Judge:
The case before us is an interlocutory appeal by the Government, pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U..S.C. § 862, and Rule for Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2002 ed.). The Government contends the military judge erred as a matter of law when he: (1) concluded that personal jurisdiction over the appellee was terminated by the delivery of an administrative discharge before his general court-martial had completed appellate review; and (2) terminated the sentence rehearing specifically authorized by order of the Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. CrotchettNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. WuterichNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. DavisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007