United States v. Davis
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, Judge:
This case is before us, pursuant to Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c), for review of the sentence adjudged at a rehearing on sentence, as approved by the convening authority (CA). The findings have previously been affirmed. We considered the record of trial, the appellant’s two assignments of error, the Government’s answer, and the appellant’s reply. We conclude the sentence is correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. See Arts. 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SantosUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019