Legal Opinion

Morgan Ex Rel. Morgan v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 29, 1956No. Civ. A. 19-56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

In this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq., the Government moves for dismissal under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., contending that the complaint fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted because barred by the two-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2401(b). This Court derives jurisdiction of the action from 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b).

The action was commenced by the filing of the complaint therein on January 16, 1956, Rule 3, R.Civ.P. Plaintiffs allege four…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  4. Maryland Ex Rel. Burkhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. Berlin v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. NevittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Born v. Norwegian America Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API