Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1972No. Civ. 71-689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EUBANKS, District Judge.

This is a product liability case. The action is predicated on (1) alleged breach of express and implied warranties attendant the use of birth control pills and (2) alleged negligence of the defendant manufacturer in failing to warn of dangers in the use of its product. Motion to dismiss was overruled by Order dated December 23, 1971. The matter now before the Court for disposition is a motion to reconsider.

The complaint alleges that Andrew N. Jorgensen and Alta J. Jorgensen are husband and wife and parents of the plaintiffs. It alleges that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. ZepedaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. Howell v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Padillow v. ElrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Morgan Ex Rel. Morgan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API