Legal Opinion

Munro v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 31, 1938No. 218PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Certiorari was granted because of conflicting views in the lower courts.

Claiming to be permanently and totally disabled, petitioner instituted an action in the United States District Court, Western District of New York, to recover under a War Risk Insurance Policy. He was honorably discharged in 1919.

Before the cause came on for trial respondent moved for dismissal because the action was not brought within the time prescribed by § 19, World War Veterans Act 1924, as amended by Act July 3,1930, 46 Stat. 992, copied in the margin. 1 This motion was overruled. Whether properly so, is the matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. United States v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. Kwai Fun WongSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Kwai Fun WongSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API